BloodSucking_Facebook

Click here to share this image on Facebook!

 

Since the Republican takeover in the House in 2011, advocates have fought with the tenacity of vampire hunters and zombie slayers to successfully block annual efforts by the House to reinstate the Global Gag Rule, prohibit a U.S. contribution to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), and slash funding for the U.S. government’s international family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) program. Like any classic horror movie plot, surviving and living to fight another day is the measure of success in Washington today.

As the November mid-term congressional election approaches, a final resolution of the fiscal year 2015 (FY 2015) appropriations process remains elusive. All federal programs have been operating at current funding levels and policies under a “continuing resolution” (CR) since the start of the fiscal year on October 1. The short-term CR expires on December 13th. Congress returns for a “lame duck” session after the election to complete any unresolved, high-priority legislative tasks, such as a final FY 2015 spending package, before adjourning for the year.

As it stands now, the respective House and Senate committee-approved versions of the FY 2015 State Department and foreign operations appropriations bill are diametrically opposed to each other in their treatment of FP/RH funding and policy. The House version (H.R. 5013) would suck the life blood out of U.S. FP/RH efforts by capping funding at $461 million or $149 million below the current level, reinstating the Global Gag Rule legislatively, and prohibiting a U.S. contribution to United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Conversely, the Senate version (S. 2499) would increase funding to the President’s budget request of $644.3 million, permanently block a future President from reimposing the Global Gag Rule unilaterally, and earmark a UNFPA contribution of $37.5 million.

If the past four fiscal years are any guide, it is likely that the House blood suckers will be kept at bay by our Senate defenders and the status quo will be preserved—more or less level funding at about $610 million (including a UNFPA contribution) appropriated and no new policy “riders,” either positive or negative, added. This funding level pales in comparison to what advocates deem is the U.S. fair share for global FP/RH needs—$1 billion per year. In addition, what flat funding really means is that the FP/RH program continues to hemorrhage due to the effects of inflation.

Regardless of the outcome of the election, there are increasing expressions of interest on Capitol Hill from both sides of the aisle and in both chambers in negotiating an omnibus spending package and starting the new Congress in January with a clean slate, rather than resorting to another short-term CR. However, some experienced Washington seers and soothsayers remain skeptical that Congress can put an omnibus in its final resting place before adjourning for the year.

You can help in ensuring that the horrific anti-family planning provisions in the House bill do not become law, whether in an omnibus or CR, by signing a petition to the leadership of the Senate Appropriations Committee urging them to stand strong in opposition to the House bill’s onslaught.

The House spending bill is one of the four scariest policies on Capitol Hill for women worldwide. To meet the other three, check out the full Nightmare on Capitol Hill site.